
I really enjoyed designing the website as I had never done so before and have always wanted to be able to personalize something like this. As I made the website I used design principles such as making sure the coloring of the text did not blend in with the background and that everything was evenly spaced so it did not look odd in comparison with the rest of the webpage. In the future, I can use these skills to create a real website for when I decide to enter the professional world via a portfolio.
Personally I have encountered QR codes in classrooms I attended and have found them to be pretty useful. Teachers have used them to create more interactive adventures or to bring us directly to pages that might have taken some navigating to arrive at. In my own classroom, I might use these codes for similar purposes. This can be through certain interactive educational adventures that I created, similar to the website design.
Scenario:
Mr. Thompson teaches 11th-grade English and has recently integrated digital writing tools into his classroom to help students draft and revise essays. One of these tools includes an AI-powered writing assistant that can generate paragraphs, rewrite text, and suggest stylistic improvements.
For a major assignment, students must write an analytical essay on The Great Gatsby. Mr. Thompson reminds the class that the essay should reflect their own ideas and that the AI tool may be used only for grammar checks.
When grading, Mr. Thompson notices that one student, Maya, submitted a highly polished essay with complex vocabulary and near-perfect grammar — a major leap from her previous writing samples. After running her essay through an AI detection program, he suspects she used the AI tool to generate parts of her essay.
When confronted, Maya explains that she only used the AI to “get started” because she had writer’s block, and then edited the AI’s output into her own voice. She argues that she learned from the process and that using AI is no different from using online sources or a thesaurus.
Mr. Thompson is torn — he values academic integrity, but he also wants to encourage students to explore technology responsibly. School policy doesn’t clearly define what counts as acceptable AI use.
Solution:
To address this scenario, I would make it clear to Maya that AI should not be a substitute for real critical thinking and growth. AI can certainly be used as a tool, but not as a replacement. I would make sure she clearly understood this difference by offering examples such as using AI to brainstorm and provide an outline for ideas but also making clear that words should not be copied. Since school policy does not define what counts as acceptable AI use, I would not punish Maya, but warn her that this is what counts for academic integrity.